fbpx

 

Hello everyone,

I'm new to the forum but have flown various Rotax 912ULS engines over the years without issues. However, following the latest Service Bulletin (SB-912-079), I've found myself with a few questions that I hope some experienced users here can help me address.

Over the past 10 years, I’ve flown two different Tecnam P92s, each equipped with a Rotax 912ULS and a fixed-pitch wooden propeller, typically reaching about 5300-5400 RPM on takeoff at wide-open throttle (WOT). These aircraft didn't have a Manifold Pressure (MAP) gauge.

Currently, I’m flying a Savannah with an E-Props V20 fixed-pitch prop, and on takeoff, it hits 5500 RPM. This aircraft has a MAP gauge, which indicates between 28 and 30 inches of MAP at takeoff, depending on atmospheric conditions—exceeding the MAP limits stated in the SB for using RON95 fuel.

I have always used European E5 gasoline (maximum 5% ethanol, RON95) as recommended for anti-knock properties.

The engine on my Savannah has about 50 flight hours, all performed with RON95 fuel, running at around 5500 RPM and approximately 30 inches of MAP for the first 2 minutes of flight (takeoff and initial climb). So far, I haven’t experienced any issues.

Unfortunately, where I live, RON98 fuel is not always readily available.

Here are my questions for those with more expertise regarding using RON95 fuel:

1. After reaching a safe altitude post-takeoff, would it make sense to throttle back to stay below 27-28 inches of MAP, which seems to be a safer range according to the SB?

2. Without noticeable detonation, could briefly exceeding the SB's MAP limits during takeoff have any measurable long-term impact on the engine? Specifically, is there evidence that this practice could lead to engine damage over time?

3. This question isn’t directly related to the SB, but I’m curious: 5500 RPM and 30 inches MAP exceed Rotax’s Maximum Continuous Power (MCP) specs (5500 RPM and 27 inches MAP). Should I consider this setting limited to 5 minutes of operation only?

Thank you in advance to anyone who can shed some light on these questions.

  • Re: Seeking Advice on MAP and RPM Limits for Rotax 912ULS (Post-SB-912-079)

    by » 7 hours ago



    Before you get too excited, check the MAP calibration. With the engine stopped, it should read the current local atmospheric pressure. 30-inch seams higher than possible unless you are at low elevation under a high-pressure system.

    If that checks out, take some pitch out of the prop. I have an E-Prop too and it is set at 5650 static but once rolling down the runway it loads up to just 5200 and slowly increases back to 5400 until it reaches 100 kts airspeed and unwinds to 5600 at 130kts at my cruise altitude.

    Could you let me know if your E-Prop behaves in a similar manner please?

     


  • Re: Seeking Advice on MAP and RPM Limits for Rotax 912ULS (Post-SB-912-079)

    by » 5 hours ago


    Yes, I operate at sea level, and in recent days, the atmospheric pressure has been around 1024 hPa (30.24 inHg).

    My propeller spins around 5400 RPM static, then reaches just over 5500 RPM during the takeoff roll. It then drops slightly during acceleration and stabilizes around 5520 RPM at WOT at 100 kts and 2500 feet. I've double-checked the values, and they are perfectly in line with what the propeller installation manual states.


You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.