fbpx

 

Folk,

As per usual, looking to benefit from your invaluable experience...

My Rotax 912ULS will be celebrating its 12 birthday next year - not sure which month, but the Serial # is 5648209 with gearbox #35138 - in case anyone can get me more detailed information ?

Anyway, it has 190 hours on the engine, and along with the aircraft, it spent 3 years in storage 2014, 2015, 2016. It flew 12 hours last year and so far 15 hours this year. Except for storage years, it has had yearly oil changes, although its coolant was changed for first time this year! All fuel hoses were changed last year, and coolant hoses were changed this year. Finally, I am planning on overhauling the carburetors this winter.

Other than that, there has been no other maintenance forward of the firewall. The carburetors were balanced last year and rechecked again this year. It has always run on Unleaded, non ethanol MOGAS. The spark plugs and air filter were changed this year. I did a leak down test before I put away for winter last year and got 79/80 for every cylinder, along with 160 - 165 direct compression on each cylinder. Finally the last oil filter change saw no debris in the cut open filter, and the the magnetic plug had very minor debris.

So...

A local Rotax mechanic (and certified Canadian Aircraft mechanic) who checks over the aircraft every year says that Rotax 912's are 'bullet proof', and provided they are looked after correctly, they easily go well beyond 12 years TBO!

I am hoping to run the engine 'on condition' during its teenage years, and hopefully it will not be as troubling as most teenagers!. It is installed in a Canadian Advanced Ultralight aircraft, and therefore has no formal TBO requirements. However, safety is important, so does anyone have any advice on changes to maintenance schedule, or additional engine procedures that I should follow once it has gone past its 12 year TBO? I want straight talk, even if that means folk recommending not running on condition and replacing with a new engine - I have been told that is cheaper than an overhaul!

For example, should I start doing laboratory oil analysis on every oil change, etc?

Any suggestions / advice appreciated.

Roger
  • Re: Running on Condition

    by » 6 years ago


    Hi Roger,

    I'm in almost the same situation as you. I am doing my 11th annual now. With 12 years and 834hrs, I asked the tech center at Lockwood about what will go wrong after 12 years in service and was told it will be seals. I have already had to replace the coolant fitting orings on top of the heads so I can agree on that part. All the rubber is always replaced on a 5 year schedule. I'm going to run on condition until the engine is no longer serviceable and replace with new as I believe the cases must be replaced for my 2006 model engine during overhaul.

    Let's see what the other Roger says.

    Alan

  • Re: Running on Condition

    by » 6 years ago


    This can be one of those topics where one side wants the TBO followed and the other side likes the on condition side.

    I like the on condition side provided that owners have been doing their preventive maint. over the life of the engine. I have many friends that are doing on condition.

    Roger Lee
    LSRM-A & Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
    Tucson, AZ Ryan Airfield (KRYN)
    520-349-7056 Cell


  • Re: Running on Condition

    by » 6 years ago


    Alan,

    I am in same position with case needing replacement. So I will simply follow all preventative maintenance schedules and keep a close eye on cylinder pressures, leaks, rubber, and for metallic debris in oil filter changes (and magnetic plug).

    Hopefully I can get another 10 years :-)

    Roger

  • Re: Running on Condition

    by » 6 years ago


    At what serial number was the crank case material changed in 2006?

  • Re: Running on Condition

    by » 6 years ago


    https://legacy.rotaxowner.com/si_tb_info/serviceb/sb-912-057-ul.pdf

    Roger Lee
    LSRM-A & Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
    Tucson, AZ Ryan Airfield (KRYN)
    520-349-7056 Cell


You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.