Is the 5 year rubber replacement truly mandatory?
Is the 5 year rubber replacement truly mandatory?
Re: 5 year rubber replacement-true need?
by Stephen Kean » 2 years ago
Have you seen the oil lines and how they've hardened? Best to keep the fliuds on the inside of the rubber...
Re: 5 year rubber replacement-true need?
by Sean Griffin » 2 years ago
(Australia)
As I understand; If your aircraft is a factory built (ie non experimental), you must comply with Rotax advisory's.
If your aircraft is a kit/home built (experimental), you can make whatever decision you deem appropriate and accept the associated risks (which may include your deceased estate being sued for your wilful negligence)
Re: 5 year rubber replacement-true need?
by Sam Purpura » 2 years ago
It’s a safety thing. How much do you value your safety.
Re: 5 year rubber replacement-true need?
by Mirek Generowicz » 2 years ago
An acquaintance of mine destroyed his aircraft in a forced landing after a hose failed in flight. It's probably more cost effective to replace the rubber every 5 years even though it might last 8 years or more before it fails. Rubber hoses are cheaper than buying a whole new aircraft.
Re: 5 year rubber replacement-true need?
by Sean Griffin » 2 years ago
And can be recycled for use in ground based equipment, abrasion covers for hoses/cables, "stand-off's" when zip tying, etc
To receive critical-to-safety information on your ROTAX Engine, please subscribe to |
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.
You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
You have allowed cookies to be placed on your computer. This decision can be reversed.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.