From now on, I'm going with Permanent Magnet Alternator! (Just to drive everyone nuts ...).
As a now-retired physicist, I'm very aware of common work usage being quite misleading when used to describe technology. "Work", for example is a word which everyone knows and intuitively understands, yet in physics/engineering it's (Force x Distance). So, walking, level, at constant speed, carrying a 50 lb sack of cement, you're doing zero work! "Generator" has a similar problem, common usage vs. its technical definition. Similarly, "magneto" in airplane circles brings to mind a hunk of metal sprouting spark plug wires which hangs at the back of a standard aircraft piston engine. More accurately, it's a magneto powered ignition system, a phrase which also applies to our Rotax engine ignition system. The power source is essentially the same, but the "ignition system" is quite different.
While Rotax may wish to avoid the use of the word "magneto", I'm not so sure it reduces confusion because most of our instrument panels have switches labelled magneto (and alternator) anyway.
Regardless, I'm glad to have a more clear understanding of the systems.
