fbpx

 

Goodbye Rotax... Sorry to say the Rotax was not a pleasant experience for me. Had my 912S for almost 6 years. First 2-3 years OK. Then problems began. Hard to start mostly. Also difficulty with magnetic plug, 3 voltage regulators, required tubing changes. Consulted with several Rotax 'experts' about starting problem, followed almost all suggestions. Overhauled carbs, new plugs, idle adjustment, bigger battery, battery charging. You name it I tried it. Never installed recommened larger cable between battery & starter though. Couldn't install larger starter due to space constaints. Saved the most expensive item for last, replacing the ignition module. Ask prominent Rotax facility about testing the ignition module. Their reply, No testing apparatus exists. Hard to believe in this age of plug-in devices for automobiles. So for almost $1200 a new ignition module seemed to do the trick. Once I got it started I got rid of it. Last year of ownership I considered the engine totally unreliable. No x-c's for fear of getting stranded. Rotax service spotty at best, and almost noone suggested the problem may be the module. With an aircraft that won't start, mechanics reluctant to leave their home airport to assist left me frustrated to say the least. I know it's probably unfair to compare the Rotax to an automobile engine but when my Saturn and Mercury always start for a total of 17 years, with hardly any service other than oil and spark plug changes, it's easy to say Rotax is lacking in design and reliability. Just look at the myriad of problems reported on this website. An the constant flow of problems found by Rotax that must be fixed ASAP. My flying experience of 65 years in all kinds of aircraft and engines reflects superior reliability except for my 250 hours with the Rotax. For you reading this tale of woe, I wish you a good experience with your engine. Sorry to say, my expectations were not met. I will continue to fly as much as I can, but with a more reliable engine up front. Thanks for your time reading this.
  • Re: Reliability

    by » 13 years ago


    :( Poor Dudley. You must of got a lemon. I had a few cars with similar unsatisfaction. I have had dozens of Rotax 912 airplanes and can tell you honestly that your eloquent post is the anomaly. They are by far the most reliable power plant I have ever owned. I have bought used Aircraft with them, and sold several new LSA kits with new Rotax 912 units, and I have never had any issues with my own fleet or any of my customers. You change the oil, follow the maintenance schedule and just fly. I have only been flying non stop for 40 years and have trained many young and old pilots. I respect your 65 years flying, and wish you the best with your choice of power plant. But please understand, your comments ring def to me as I know your the anomaly and hope that your views do not unjustly persuade others from trying the unquestionable best LSA power plant ever designed. A slight side note is that I currently fly an RV4 with a Lycoming 160 HP, and I wish I had the maintenace experience My wife and I have had with Rotax. Fair and Balanced, Best of Air to you all.

  • Re: Reliability

    by » 13 years ago


    Glad to hear of your good experience with Rotax engines. I don't believe my experience with Rotax was an anomaly however. You only need to look at this website to see the many problems other Rotax operators are having with this engine.

  • Re: Reliability

    by » 13 years ago


    Hi Dudley,

    Rotax has many thousands of engines out there and 4 million plus flight hours. Not all of those people post here saying everything is going good. The forums on all aircraft and engines usually deal with people who want to know how to do something or have a problem. These forums are where people come for answers since not everyone has gone to specific schools and want to do their own work.
    Most Rotax and even other engine company woes can most of the time can be traced back to the owner, but since engines are just mechanical things that we build and maintain they do fail at times. Any thing we purchase in life can and does fail for someone, some where, it's the customer service that will set companies apart. I think Rotax is quite pro-active when they find an issue themselves or have a continuing issue from the field.

    Roger Lee
    LSRM-A & Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
    Tucson, AZ Ryan Airfield (KRYN)
    520-349-7056 Cell


  • Re: Reliability

    by » 7 years ago


    I don't think it's an anomaly for a Rotax engine to have problems. I've had one melt down at 47 hours. The second engine had a nasty vibration that required the prop to be balanced. It's a touchy platform at best. I see it as more of a quality issue and lack of proper engineering when it comes to making changes. The US customer support is miserable. There are a lot of reasons to be concerned about this engine WRT reliability and support. Dual carbs shouldn't be the problem that it appears to be on the Rotax.

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.