fbpx

 

Has anyone had issues with a 2006 912ULS? Rotax were brought to task by EASA (2006-042-IN-ENG)regarding poorly finished tappets - rough machined finished. This resulted in a polishing machine being purchased. However no attempt was made to recall engines in the field - only a directive to inspect the magnetic plug. An incident in early 2007 indicated that this did not give much warning of future problems.
My camshaft failed in July this year with minutes of notice (just climbing CHT and Oil temps - on a very hot day)when returning on a trip. Luckily we were only 6 miles from a good airfield and made it in. This trip was meant to be across the English Channel but it got postponed!! The engine was scrap and a new one had to be purchased - a big unexpected expense at only 970 hours. A few weeks later the old one was taken apart and to my horror I saw that 5 of the tappets must have had a rough finish when new. The other three were polished. I have since heard that of our fleet of eight C42s at the airfield three have had the camshaft fail too - all 2006 engines and around the 1000 hour mark! Logic says that a camshaft working against rough and hardened tappet is not going to last like one operating with polished tappets. Inspecting the mag plug every 100 hours very likely won't catch an incipient failure and ruined engine.
Tappeta.jpg (You do not have access to download this file.)
  • Re: 2006 Engine Tappets

    by » 11 years ago


    I had a 2006 engine eat the #1 exhaust lifter due to loss of hardness on the tapper coating at 833 hrs. Ground it right down. In seconds. There are no warnings and when it happens you are running on three cylinders and need to land right then and there. There is no fixing the engine it's done. New engine time.
    This is quite rare unless of course it happens to you.

    Roger Lee
    LSRM-A & Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
    Tucson, AZ Ryan Airfield (KRYN)
    520-349-7056 Cell


  • Re: 2006 Engine Tappets

    by » 11 years ago


    I am afraid I don't think it is rare on a 2006 engine. At our airfield, from what I can glean, one went at 800 hours, mine at 970 hours and one at just over 1000 hours. I think the ultimate failure (misfire) is where the tappets start sticking. By which time the crankcase bearings are scored to hell.

    It would be very useful if an oil debris indicator was fitted in place of the magnetic plug. It would avoid unsafe flights and trashed engines. Rotax should have recalled all the affected engines or arranged partial refunds upon failure.
    If you have a 2006 engine then I would certainly check the mag plug every few hours- and certainly before a trip over water

  • Re: 2006 Engine Tappets

    by » 11 years ago


    I don't think the magnetic plug would show up a wearing tappet.

    The metal particles will be flushed out of the crankcase with the oil and the oil will flow out from the gearbox into the crankcase.

    The particles will then be taken into the oil tank and if they were to be sucked out of the oil tank back to the engine, they would not make it past the filter.

    I have a magnetic plug in the crankcase drain that isn't used and one in the oil tank drain plug as well.

    The mag plug is only good for gear box particles.

    Mark

    Thank you said by: YEN NIEN YU

  • Re: 2006 Engine Tappets

    by » 11 years ago


    There is no warning when the tapper fails.if your flying and it loses its hardness coating it fails right then and there. I had metal filings in the the oil (drained it over magnets), I had filings in the oil filter, my mag plug had a metal dust beard and the engine was loaded with metal dust in every orifice and bearing. With all the metal dust in every orifice and bearing this is why the engine is done. An uneven wear pattern is different from a failure .

    Roger Lee
    LSRM-A & Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
    Tucson, AZ Ryan Airfield (KRYN)
    520-349-7056 Cell


  • Re: 2006 Engine Tappets

    by » 11 years ago


    Well I have a 2006 engine. How many, percentage wise, of these engines have failed? I have 570 hours so far.

    Alan

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.