fbpx

 

  • Re: 912ULS EGT Differences

    by » 6 years ago


    Ok, sounds like a good way to go. I'll report back. Thanks.

  • Re: 912ULS EGT Differences

    by » 6 years ago


    Those probes in the pictures are way too close to the exhaust flange. They aren't 100 mm.
    The bends in the probes could make them go bad or will if they get played with anymore.

    Roger Lee
    LSRM-A & Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
    Tucson, AZ Ryan Airfield (KRYN)
    520-349-7056 Cell


  • Re: 912ULS EGT Differences

    by » 6 years ago


    I would also discourage Ty-Raping the sensor lead wire back to the body of the Hot Zone of the sensor.
    This will slightly insulate the sensor and also overheat the wire. Bad on both accounts.
    If you need to shed some of the length of the wire, form it into a loop and Ty-Rap it to itself.
    Securing it to the Spring is OK if needed

    EGTProbe.jpg (You do not have access to download this file.)

    Bill Hertzel
    Rotax 912is
    North Ridgeville, OH, USA
    Clicking the "Thank You" is Always Appreciated by Everyone.


    Thank you said by: John Melchert, Andrew Dunning

  • Re: 912ULS EGT Differences

    by » 6 years ago


    A very good point, thanks. This is how things were when I received the plane to do its condition inspection and replace the exhaust. I just put it back to the way it was, but will change it now.

You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.