by Rotax Wizard » 4 months ago
Hi Jeff....I cant see anywhere in the MML where you have to replace the main pump at 1000 hours. It clearly calls for a check of both pumps at 1000 hours nothing more. The hose change at 5 year is based on time only.
In a dual electric system I would run both pumps personally. With a 3 bar, 45 psi system, any failure of the running pump the engine will stop. With both running you will not lose power at all. If you are only on one pump you must now do a restart, this starts to get stressful in my opinion. I know that for the 915 and 916 engines the same verbiage exists and at about 3k per pump people will not replace them at 1000 hour.
Perhaps i am missing something, I looked at the latest (2023) MML in the scheduled maintenance.
Cheers
by doug johnson » 4 months ago
Still since the 912is came out is there no documented failures? Can’t believe certification wouldn’t have required even bench testing till failure.
by Roger Lee » 4 months ago
They’ve had some leaks, but haven’t heard of any total failures. Maybe Rotax folks will chime in on any failures.
Roger Lee
LSRM-A & Rotax Instructor & Rotax IRC
Tucson, AZ Ryan Airfield (KRYN)
520-349-7056 Cell
by Jeff B » 4 months ago
RW,
My bad, you are correct there is no requirement to replace the pump at 1000 hours. I accidently looked at the 914 MML this morning and that does require the main pump change at 1000 hours. The 914 has a similar pump set up to the 912iS (same form factor) but the pumps are lower pressure. Do you know what drives the 1000 hour replacement of the 914 pump? The below page is from the 914 manual.
And as for failures of the 912iS pump, I saw one that pushed itself apart. The internal pressure pushed the plastic end cap out past the retaining crimps in the housing. This particular aircraft did not have a high pressure bypass on the return line and the main pump was accidentally started with the fuel selector in the off position. More than one manufacturer missed the requirement for the high pressure bypass on the return line around the dual selector valve. I think I heard that later model pumps have an internal high pressure bypass to avoid this, but I don’t know for sure.
by doug johnson » 4 months ago
I guess ROTAX will chime in at some point given multiple operational configurations and safety concerns…hope we hear something.
To receive critical-to-safety information on your ROTAX Engine, please subscribe to |
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.
You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
You have allowed cookies to be placed on your computer. This decision can be reversed.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.