by Garrett Wysocki » 2 years ago
I live and fly in Florida. Summer months small cooler could not get the job done, so large cooler combined wth the thermostat together they maintain close to 205 deg F (measured after the cooler) year round in all temperatures no matter how I run the engine/airplane. I don't have to wait long for warm up or have to tell ATC that I need to stop and or decrease the climb to let my oil cool, I fly in some busy airspace.
by Sean Griffin » 2 years ago
96C - very nice oil/coolant temperature to have in cruise.
In the Australian summer, my Rotax 912ULS (no oil thermostat) takes roughly 6 minutes to get to 50C - it will take longer in our winter, may be 7-8 minutes. I use this (low RPM) time to work through my pre-flight rituals/tests, taxi to the run up bay - works for me & my engine.
I accept/understand that liquid thermostats are a desirable (even necessary) accessory in areas that experiencing extended periods below freezing but otherwise, cant see the benefit (faster warm up) out ways the additional cost, complexity, weight & risk (all those extra joins = failure points).
A thermostat is unlikely to improve your oil/coolant cooling - this is all down to the heat exchangers (radiator/oil cooler/barrel fins) performance. Your installation of a larger/more effective oil cooler has addressed your operational needs - good job!
To receive critical-to-safety information on your ROTAX Engine, please subscribe to |
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.
You have declined cookies. This decision can be reversed.
You have allowed cookies to be placed on your computer. This decision can be reversed.
This website uses cookies to manage authentication, navigation, and other functions. By using our website, you agree that we can place these types of cookies on your device.