fbpx

 

  • Re: Why don't we monitor crankcase temperature?

    by » 7 years ago


    I'm presently trying to figure out the cooling capacity of a radiator, not that I actually NEED that to live my life, but rather as personal education on the subject. ;-)
    From the installation manual, there is a total of 1,5 l (0.4 gal (US) of coolant in our airplanes.
    If I assume that the pump circulates that quantity 3 times during one minute, that's 1.2 gal. per minute. I also assume that the water is at around 212 deg., and that the IN-OUT temp. differential in the radiator is 1 degree.
    According to a calculator on the internet, that would give a cooling capacity of 1000 BTU/hour.
    That doesn't seem very high... At home, my air conditioning unit is a 15000BTU, and the amount of cold air it can produce is not, hmm, impressive. (Of course, the in-out temp-diff is much higher than in our airplane calculations here.)
    So maybe that 1000 BTU/Hr is not bad at all, but I have difficulty visualizing how good (or bad) it is.
    Any takers?

  • Re: Why don't we monitor crankcase temperature?

    by » 7 years ago


    Unfortunately...
    it is a lot more complicated than that and much is counter intuitive. But have fun and education is all good. However I was told that a good rule of thumb is that minimum coolant flowrate needs to be about 1l/hp (I know mixing units horrible) so that is about 100L/min for a 100 hp engine, or 26 gal/min for those of you from behind the hamburger curtain.

    Also ICE engines are at best 30% efficient and generally they throw away 1/3 in the exhaust 1/3 in the radiator and 1/3 in the shaft. So you need to dump 100hp out the radiator (75kw) or god only knows what a BTU is...

  • Re: Why don't we monitor crankcase temperature?

    by » 7 years ago


    Wow! 100L per minute is enormous, almost 2 L per second!
    No way the little pump on the 912 can do that.

    That 100HP worth of heat in the radiator is 75KW, and 75 KW/Hr is also equivalent to (gulp) 256,000 BTU!

    I'll have to think this further. I think I'll get my old books out.
    Meanwhile, I'll consider installing a spraybar system in front of my radiator, LOL

    Cheers

  • Re: Why don't we monitor crankcase temperature?

    by » 7 years ago


    LOL indeed,
    the amazing thing is that it all works so well. Wonderful what 100 year+ of development will get you...

  • Re: Why don't we monitor crankcase temperature?

    by » 7 years ago


    It is always useful to refer to the Installation Manual for the 912ULS engine. Chapter 75-00-00

    Flow Rate = ~60l/min = ~16gal/min @5800rpm
    Heat Flow = 28kW/sec = 27BTU/sec = 95,000 BTU/hour. (~8 Tons)
    Recommended Radiator area = ~500cm^2 = ~80in^2

    The installation Manual assumes 0.4 gallons for the engine and small hoses.
    The radiator and the 25mm hoses are not included.
    Over-assuming 1 gallon of total coolant gives under 4 seconds to circulate the entire volume.
    1 gal = 8lbs ... 27btu/8lbs = ~3.5°F/sec times 4 seconds = ~14°F Temp differential in the circuit.

    ~ ~ ~ A Side Bar.

    BTU = 1055 Joules = ~0.95kW
    Historically, it is the amount of heat required to raise one pound of water one degree Fahrenheit.

    One TON of Water Ice will absorb ~12,000BTUs as it melts.

    Back in the 1800's, a 1 Ton mechanical Refrigeration unit would be installed in place of a 1 Ton "Ice Box".
    People were familiar with Tons of Ice and the Power of a Horse in those days. BTUs and Ft-Lbs /sec fell on deaf ears.

    A whole house air conditioner might be a 15 Ton unit, not 15,000 BTU.

    Bill Hertzel
    Rotax 912is
    North Ridgeville, OH, USA
    Clicking the "Thank You" is Always Appreciated by Everyone.


You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.