fbpx

 

<rant>

Did Rotax just pull the Lord J3608-1 rubber mount recommendation for the 9-series "Suspension Frame" (ring mount) out of its a$$? That rubber mount was designed for cast, stepped holes in certain C85, C90, and O-200 engine cases. To build a motor mount to interface with the J3608, you have to  recreate that stepped hole in those engine cases.

Also, the bolt hole in the ring mount is 7/16" and the bolt hole in the J3608 is 3/8".  That means you have to sleeve the hole in the ring mount if you want to use the J3608. Am I missing something (wouldn't be the first time)?

</rant>

Has anyone had success building a motor mount for the 9-series ring mount using a different rubber mount set, ideally with a 7/16" bolt hole, that is appropriate for the vibration of the engine and easier to build a motor mount around?

Thanks in advance,

John Hawkins, Onex

10579_1_Rotax Ring Suspension Frame.png (You do not have access to download this file.)
10579_1_Rotax Lord J3608 diagram.png (You do not have access to download this file.)
You do not have permissions to reply to this topic.